Veteran's Thoughts On Obama

I read this post and I wanted to share it with you. Please pass this around to your family and friends.


tnflash19736:05PMMay 27th 2008

I'm a veteran and in reading some of the republican responses, which I agree on, I have to comment on one comment about taking on Iran. First off ALL soldiers are volunteers. We weren't drafted nor were we made to go anywhere. We voluteered when we raised our hand and swore to DEFEND this country from terrorists foreign or domestic. We fight so you Obama supporters can run your damn mouths and be negative about what we're doing. You speak negatively about what we're doing and you want us to retreat before we finish our job which if we do you'll pay for dearly. Bottomline is when you retreat the bad guy gains the ground. The country wasn't made free without a fight and in continuing the freedom we volunteered to continue the fight.
Obama turned his back on the flag and to me that speaks volumes. There's no excuse for it and it's a terrorist offense in my book. He won't sing the Star Spangled Banner because it's offensive so I ask you won't it be offensive to you when he raises a muslim backed flag atop the White House? Then you'll call on the volunteers to do something. Quit running your mouth about something you know nothing about. Iran is a threat and to them we are infidels whom they want nothing more than to kill. I say get them before they get us.
McCain is a vet that has seen hell and lived it. He lives by our code of never leaving a man behind. Obama would certainly forget us and you too. Let us do our job so that you can keep protesting. As long as you're able to do that then we know we're doing our jobs!!!

The Best Obama Video

PLEASE pass this video on to everyone you know!

Obama's Own Words On Race

Subject: Obama's words

Obama's OWN WORDS !! - A Quick MUST READ !!

This guy wants to be our President and control our government. Pay close attention to the last comment!! Below are a few lines from Obama's books, his words:

From Dreams of My Father: 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.

From Dreams of My Father : 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mothers race.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'There was something about him that mad me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and get name names.

From Dreams of My Father: 'I never emulate white men and brown men whose
fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.'

From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'

Montana Rancher Takes On Obama

A friend of mine sent me this. I thought you would enjoy reading this one. Sounds like this Rancher is a wise man!


While suturing a cut on the hand of a 75 year old Montana rancher,
whose hand was caught in a gate while working cattle, the doctor
struck up a conversation with the old man. Eventually the topic got
around to Obama and his bid to be our President.

The old rancher said, 'Well, ya know, Obama is a 'post turtle'.'
Not being familiar with the term, the doctor asked him what a 'post
turtle' was. The old rancher said, 'When you're driving down a
country road and you come across a fence post with a turtle
balanced on top, that's a 'post turtle'.' The old man saw a puzzled
look on the doctor's face, so he continued to explain.

'You know he didn't get up there by himself, he doesn't belong up
there, he doesn't know what to do while he is up there, and you
just want to help the dumb ass get down.'

Let's Look At Obama

Gary Boggess10:47AMMay 20th 2008

I have been searching the web for insight concerning the next
presidential election. In my searching and reading... it was EASY to
figure out why I didn't want Hillary in the White House because I was
able to examine REAL substance concerning her current views and
positions, and weigh the evidence of "what she said" with "what she
actually did" in her past political performance. Without going into
detail, I was able to discern WHAT she stands for, and form my
responses to it. I was also satisfied to follow the same process with
McCain. BOTH have a past I can examine. BOTH (on most issues), are
fairly clear about who they are and what they'd do IF elected. As a
result... I have declared myself a political orphan this election. I
have concluded that THIS election is a sham of unprecedented
dimensions. Here we are in the midst of the worst problems we've ever
faced, and we've got THREE JOKERS running for president.

So... what's left? Obama. Well I've been watching Obama. And although I
think he's a very good oratator, speaker, presenter and he LOOKS like
someone who has it together, I am stumped to explain to myself HOW this
man could sit in a clearly racist church for 20 years. I mean... here's
a guy who is offering us CHANGE. He's also offering LEADERSHIP... and
he claims that he's qualified to make critical decisions for the
country. But after hearing Rev. Wright's hate- teach, Obama just sat
there for TWENTY YEARS! It doesn't take a wrecking ball for me to see;
that if Obama couldn't pick his ass up and leave that church 19 1/2
years ago, that he is no leader. He didn't CHANGE his church
affiliations. He didn't CHANGE his racist political associations. He
didn't CHANGE his support for men who OBVIOUSLY supported and even
awarded Louis Farakhan, an anti-semite, anti-white racist "Man of the
Year" 2007! And Obama didn't CHANGE ANYTHING until the media & public
opinion FORCED him to. And I'm sorry... but that nice little "B&W
racial" speech he gave in Philadelphia just didn't FIX IT for me. WORDS
mean things... and if they do... DEEDS precede and follow. As far as
I'm concerned, Obama is 19 1/2 years too late.

So... as a result... I have been looking for reasons WHY people believe
in this man who obviously doesn't BELIEVE HIS OWN SPEAK!!! Because if
he did, the above two paragraphs wouldn't need written.

I have been looking for substance concerning Obama's claims for CHANGE.
And I can't come up with substantive comparable's to Hitlary or McLame.
Obama offers us a collection of empty political rhetoric tantamount to
political vapor-ware! No Substance. No history to support it. Nothing
but ambiguous WORDS. I'm sorry... being a good speaker isn't a
qualification for being a leader, much less a President!

I searched the web, and I "GET IT" that Obama is offering CHANGE. BUT
WHAT CHANGE? Obama has yet to define it. I can't define it. Nobody can.
Promises are one thing. HOW is another. I emailed a few of my black
friends in Ohio... and they told me they're as lost as I am concerning
Obama. WHAT CHANGE are we looking for and if things CAN BE CHANGED,
does it matter HOW anyone DOES IT??

GERMANY got "CHANGE" once... and it wasn't a good change. I see that
Obama proposed a house bill proposing that the American people commit
to paying over $850-billion in handouts to "a world poverty tax." Are
we going to do that while we're chasing our own families out of their
homes due to foreclosure because there's no jobs left here? Talk about
NAFTA taking jobs away and allowing corporate fascism to control our
government, and leaving Americans with no jobs and a run away
inflationary economy headed into depression!!! READ THIS!>>
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/2/20/does-obama-want-a-trillion-dollar-global-tax.html

WHAT DOES OBAMA MEAN WHEN HE SAYS THE WORD, CHANGE!!!????? And when he
refers to these changes... HOW does he justify doing it? You might be
tired of the same old Washington CRAP. I sure am. I'm for change BIG
TIME! But WHAT change are we talking about!!???
Gary Boggess10:47AMMay 20th 2008

I have been searching the web for insight concerning the next
presidential election.
Obama. Well I've been watching Obama. And although I think he's a very
good oratator, speaker, presenter and he LOOKS like someone who has it
together, I am stumped to explain to myself HOW this man could sit in a
clearly racist church for 20 years. I mean... here's a guy who is
offering us CHANGE. He's also offering LEADERSHIP... and he claims that
he's qualified to make critical decisions for the country. But after
hearing Rev. Wright's hate- teach, Obama just sat there for TWENTY
YEARS! It doesn't take a wrecking ball for me to see; that if Obama
couldn't pick his ass up and leave that church 19 1/2 years ago, that
he is no leader. He didn't CHANGE his church affiliations. He didn't
CHANGE his racist political associations. He didn't CHANGE his support
for men who OBVIOUSLY supported and even awarded Louis Farakhan, an
anti-semite, anti-white racist "Man of the Year" 2007! And Obama didn't
CHANGE ANYTHING until the media & public opinion FORCED him to. And I'm
sorry... but that nice little "B&W racial" speech he gave in
Philadelphia just didn't FIX IT for me. WORDS mean things... and if
they do... DEEDS precede and follow. As far as I'm concerned, Obama is
19 1/2 years too late.

So... as a result... I have been looking for reasons WHY people believe
in this man who obviously doesn't BELIEVE HIS OWN SPEAK!!! Because if
he did, the above two paragraphs wouldn't need written.

I have been looking for substance concerning Obama's claims for CHANGE.
And I can't come up with substantive comparable's to Hitlary or McLame.
Obama offers us a collection of empty political rhetoric tantamount to
political vapor-ware! No Substance. No history to support it. Nothing
but ambiguous WORDS. I'm sorry... being a good speaker isn't a
qualification for being a leader, much less a President!

I searched the web, and I "GET IT" that Obama is offering CHANGE. BUT
WHAT CHANGE? Obama has yet to define it. I can't define it. Nobody can.
Promises are one thing. HOW is another. I emailed a few of my black
friends in Ohio... and they told me they're as lost as I am concerning
Obama. WHAT CHANGE are we looking for and if things CAN BE CHANGED,
does it matter HOW anyone DOES IT??

GERMANY got "CHANGE" once... and it wasn't a good change. I see that
Obama proposed a house bill proposing that the American people commit
to paying over $850-billion in handouts to "a world poverty tax." Are
we going to do that while we're chasing our own families out of their
homes due to foreclosure because there's no jobs left here? Talk about
NAFTA taking jobs away and allowing corporate fascism to control our
government, and leaving Americans with no jobs and a run away
inflationary economy headed into depression!!! READ THIS!>>
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/2/20/does-obama-want-a-trillion-dollar-global-tax.html

WHAT DOES OBAMA MEAN WHEN HE SAYS THE WORD, CHANGE!!!????? And when he
refers to these changes... HOW does he justify doing it? You might be
tired of the same old Washington CRAP. I sure am. I'm for change BIG
TIME! But WHAT change are we talking about!!???

Obama Lies About Money

Obama Losing His Bearings?

Wasn't it just a few days ago that he said McCain was losing his bearings? Well. Obama either has lost his bearings or he is confused about how many states there are.

Ken Blackwell On Obama

----- What a black columnist has to say about Obama

Ken Blackwell - Columnist for the New York Sun

It's an amazing time to be alive in America . We're in a year of firsts in this presidential election: the first viable woman candidate; the first viable African-American candidate; and, a candidate who is the first frontrunning fr! eedom f ighter over 70. The next president of America will be a first.

We won't truly be in an election of firsts, however, until we judge every candidate by where they stand. We won't arrive where we should be until we no longer talk about skin color or gender. Now that Barack Obama steps to the front of the Democratic field, we need to stop talking about his race, and start talking about his policies and his politics.

The reality is this: Though the Democrats will not have a nominee until August, unless Hillary Clinton drops out, Mr. Obama is now the frontrunner, and its time America takes a closer and deeper look at him.
Some pundits are calling him the next John F. Kennedy. He's not. He's the next George McGovern. And it's time people learned the facts.

Because the tr uth is that Mr Obama is the single most liberal senator in the entire U.S. ! Senate. He is more liberal than Ted Kennedy, Bernie Sanders, or Mrs. Clinton. Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost.

Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he's not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a be auty pageant. Mr. Obama talks about getting past party, getting pa! st red and blue, to lead the United States of America . But let's look at the more defined strokes of who he is underneath this superficial 'beauty.'

Start with national security, since the president's most important duties are as commander-in-chief. Over the summer, Mr. Obama talked about invading Pakistan, a nation armed with nuclear weapons; meeting without preconditions with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who vows to destroy Israel and create another Holocaust; and Kim Jong II, who is murdering and starving his people, but emphasized that the nuclear option was off the table against terrorists - something no president has ever taken off the table since we created nuclear weapons in the 1940s. Even Democrats ! who hav e worked in national security condemned all of those remarks. Mr. Obama is a foreign-policy novice who would put our national security at risk.

Next, consider economic policy. For all its faults, our health care system is the strongest in the world. And free trade agreements, created by Bill Clinton as well as President Bush, have made more goods more affordable so that even people of modest means can live a life that no one imagined a generation ago Yet Mr Obama promises to rais e taxes on 'the rich.' How to fix Social Security? Raise taxes. How to fix Medicare? Raise taxes. Prescription drugs? Raise taxes. Free college? Raise taxes Socialize medicine? Raise taxes. His! soluti on to everything is to have government take it over. Big Brother on steroids, funded by your paycheck.

Finally, look at the social issues. Mr. Obama had the audacity to open a stadium rally by saying, 'All praise and glory to God!' but says that Christian leaders speaking for life and marriage have 'hijacked' - hijacked - Christianity. He is pro-partial birth abortion, and promises to appoint Supreme Court justices who will rule any restriction on it unconstitutional. He espouses the abortion views of Margaret Sanger, one of the early advocates of racial cleansing. His spiritual leaders endorse homosexual marriage, and he is moving in that direction. In Ill inois, he refused to vote against a statewide ban - ban - on all handguns in the state. These are radical left, Hollywood , and San Francis co values, not Middle America values.

The real Mr. Obama is an easy target for the general election. Mrs. Clinton is a far tougher opponent. But Mr. Obama could win if people don't start looking behind his veneer and flowery speeches. His vision of 'bringing America together' means saying that those who disagree with his agenda for America are hijackers or warmongers. Uniting the country means adopting his liberal agenda and abandoning any conflicting beliefs

But right now everyone is talking about how eloquent of a speaker he is and - yes - they're talking about his race. Those should never be the factors on which we base our choice for president. Mr. Obama's radical agenda sets him far outside the American mainstream, to the left of Mrs. Clinton.

It's time to talk about the real Barack Obama. In an election of firsts, let's first make sure we elect the! person who is qualified to be our president in a nuclear age during a global civilizational war.

Subject: Kind of scary, wouldn't you think
Remember--God is good, and is in time, on time--every time.
According to The Book of Revelations the anti-christ is:
The anti-christ will be a man, in his 40s, of MUSLIM descent, who will deceive the nations with persuasive language, and have a MASSIVE Christ-like appeal...the prophecy says that people will floc k to him and he will promise false hope and world peace, and when he is in power, will destroy everything. Is it OBAMA??

I STRONGLY URGE each one of you to copy this and post it and email it as many times as you can! Each opportunity that you have to send it to a friend or media outlet..do it!
If you think I am crazy..I'm sorry but I refuse to take a chance on the 'unknown' candidate.

Obama Lies On Social Secutiry

This is just my 2 cents but I'm curious why Obama says that "people like myself (Obama) are paying a little bit more".

As a member of the legislative branch of our goverment (Senators and members of the House of Representatives) they do not pay anything into the Social Security trust fund. Not a single penny of their salary is subject to the social security tax. They have a completely separate retirement fund that is 100 percent funded by the taxpayers (that would be people like you and me) and the cost to them is nothing.

How dare he use himself as an example of someone who would be willing to contribute more of his salary to Social Security because despite a six digit income, these people contribute zip. It's very easy for them to take action on raising this tax because its a tax that they don't pay so raising it doesn't affect their bottom line at all. It only affects us taxpayers but then again when did any of these elected officials really care about us (I mean really care in us, not just pander to get our vote).

Don't you find it interesting that we are all forced to pay into a fund that none of the Governement employees use?

I don't know about you, but I can't afford one more cent of taxes, period!

Obama Wants A Converstation about Race

by Patrick J. Buchanan
>
>
> Barack says we need to have a conversation about race in America.?
>
> Fair enough. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America
> needs to be heard from, not just lectured to.
>
> This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and
> demands heard. And among them are these:
>
> First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here
> that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a
> community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the
> grest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.
>
> Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.
>
> Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans.
> Untold trillions have been spent since the '60s on welfare, food stamps, rent
> supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services,
> Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the
> African-American community into the mainstream.
>
> Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against
> white folks -- with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas -- to
> advance black applicants over white applicants.
>
> Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America
> have donated time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care,
> retirement and nursing homes for blacks.
>
> We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude??
>
> Barack talks about new 'ladders of opportunity' for blacks.
>
> Let him go to Altoona? and Johnstown, and ask the white kids in Catholic schools
> how many were visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships
> for 'deserving' white kids.?
>
> Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and inca
> rceration rates for African-Americans are seven times those of white America? Is
> it really white America 's fault that illegitimacy in the African-American
> community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in
> some cities has reached 50 percent?
>
> Is that the fault of white America or, first and foremost, a failure of the
> black community itself?
>
> As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially
> interracial crimes of violence. Is Barack Obama aware that while white criminals
> choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims
> 45 percent of the time?
>
> Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the
> reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first
> three years of this decade as the reverse?
>
> We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley, the Duke
> rape case and Jena. And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of
> black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing.
>
> Sorry, Barack, some of us have heard it all before, about 40 years and 40
trillion tax dollars ago.

Obama Lies, Lies and More Lies!

Obama Lies About His Pastor~ Wright

Obama's Rezko Connection